KITUO CHA SHERIA SUES SAFARICOM OVER OBJECTION OF STARLINK ENTRY INTO KENYAN MARKET
Kituo cha Sheria, a legal advocacy group, has filed a lawsuit against Safaricom PLC. They are demanding that SpaceX’s Starlink satellite internet service be allowed into the Kenyan market.
The Communication Authority of Kenya (CA) and the Competition Authority of Kenya (CAK) are also named in the case. Kituo cha Sheria argues that allowing Starlink would enhance internet access and lower prices for consumers.
Safaricom had earlier requested that the CA require SpaceX to partner with local providers. They claim Starlink’s direct entry threatens mobile network quality.
However, Kituo cha Sheria, led by Dr. Annette Mbogoh, argues that Safaricom’s stance will hinder faster internet access and keep prices high.
In their petition, Kituo claimed Safaricom’s July 5, 2024 letter to the CA was unfounded. They accused Safaricom of lacking impartial judgment due to its competitive interests.
High Court Judge Chacha Mwita heard that Safaricom fears Starlink’s lower service costs. Kituo cha Sheria revealed Safaricom charges Sh6000 for internet access, while Starlink offers 50GB for Sh1800.
“The allegations in Safaricom’s July 5, 2024 letter are baseless. Safaricom is biased due to its market dominance,” Mbogoh said.
The legal team for Kituo cha Sheria includes Marc Chirchir, Ahmed Sigat, Abdul Maalim, and Nelius Njuguna. They argue blocking Starlink would result in slow and costly internet options for consumers.
The court was informed that SpaceX aims to provide global internet coverage through Starlink. This commercial model is gaining popularity worldwide.
Kituo cha Sheria seeks a court ruling declaring Safaricom’s actions unconstitutional. They also want an injunction preventing the CA from restricting Starlink’s operations in Kenya.
Chirchir stated, “A conservatory order of injunction should be issued restraining CA and CAK from prejudicing Starlink’s operations.”
The organisation warns that blocking Starlink would force Kenyan consumers to endure high internet costs. “If urgent action isn’t taken, respondents’ actions threaten constitutional rights and liberties,” Chirchir added.
